Safety & Flexibility: Alcon Intrepid Polymer I/A Tips

March 12, 2010 by Jason Carpenter  
Filed under Featured Products

Released by Alcon in late 2009, the Alcon Intrepid Polymer I/A tip has brought a sense of increased safety and flexibility into cataract procedures.  Although, not as soft as the Alcon silicone I/A tip, this polycarbonate material still provides the same safety in allowing to polish the capsule and maintaining the integrity of the capsular bag.

In addition to not only providing safety through its design, it is also a “true” single use device that is disposed of after each case thusly reducing potential factors (such as residual, cortical material)  that could attribute to TASS.  The tips come in three configurations, a straight, 20 degree soft curve, and the 35 degree bent tip.  Each of the tip configurations has a .3mm aspiration port and the flange design to allow for proper placement of the sleeve. All of the tips are fully compatible with the threaded Ultraflow handpieces and with all MicroSmooth sleeves.  The Intrepid Polymer I/A tips are unique and quality products to add to any cataract surgeons procedures.

  • Share/Bookmark

Mock Surgery day

February 23, 2010 by James Sanders  
Filed under Features

The 19TH Annual Mock Surgery day at Brackenridge Hospital was a huge success. Approximately 1500 people attended the event. A wide variety of groups and organizations were represented as they shared information on various topics pertaining to good health and general safety. Those who attended learned about subjects like; kidney disease, diabetes, cancer, fire safety and more. The hospital also had staff on hand to show people how to bandage wounds and even the trauma department was represented.

Vantage Outsourcing was invited to participate in the event and for the first time ever cataracts were covered. Information was shared, which answered a variety of questions, such as:

  • What is a cataract?
  • How does it form?
  • Who can get cataracts?
  • How long does the procedure take?

Along with this information, the cataract surgery was described, the surgical instruments were on hand for viewing and some of the different types of lens implants were discussed. Overall, a lot of information was provided.

Vantage Outsourcing had a great time at this public event and is looking forward to further the publics knowledge when it comes to Cataract Procedures.

  • Share/Bookmark

Red reflex test to all newborns recommended

January 22, 2010 by EyeWorld  
Filed under Eyeworld

Physicians at The Vision Center of Children’s Hospital, Los Angeles, are strongly advocating a basic eye exam, including a red reflex test, be given to all children shortly after birth, the center said. Angela Buffenn, M.D., M.P.H., Director of the Orbit and Eye Movement Institute and Diana Dennis, M.A. of the Therapeutic Living Center for the Blind, reported on the problem of inadequate childhood vision screenings in Pediatric News. The red reflex test involves looking at the infant\’s eyes through an ophthalmoscope in a dimly lit room to see if there are any abnormalities in the back of the eye or white spots in the eyeball. The test is used to screen for abnormalities in the eye itself as well as ocular misalignment. If the red reflex is found to be abnormal, the child should be examined by a pediatric ophthalmologist in order to test for strabismus (crossed eyes), cataracts, glaucoma, retinoblastoma, retinal abnormalities, and high refractive errors. Oftentimes, the test is first administered by a pediatrician or family physician. The red reflex test has been endorsed as an important part of a well child visit by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

“Too often we see children with developmental delay whose visual system has not been properly evaluated. Sometimes, parents also think that vision loss is less important than treating the seizure disorder or developmental disability, when the truth is we can address both at the same time,” said Dr. Buffenn.

  • Share/Bookmark

Study Finds AMD Patients Can Benefit from Cataract Surgery

January 11, 2010 by Beckers ASC Review  
Filed under Becker's ASC Review, Features

A multi-center study published in the November issue of Ophthalmology suggests that cataract surgery can improve vision in patients with any stage of age-related macular degeneration, according to a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

The study is the first study to evaluate the effects of cataract surgery on AMD that includes a statistically appropriate number of advanced AMD patients. Data for the study were obtained from the multi-center, prospective Age-Related Eye Disease Study, funded by the National Eye Institute.

The study included 1,244 participants and analyzed data for 1,939 eyes with various stages of AMD. Patients were evaluated for visual acuity (sharpness) before and after cataract surgery, and the study found that most patients with AMD — from mild to advanced — gained visual acuity after cataract surgery. The study also found that patients with vision worse than 20/40 before surgery experienced the most improvement. No difference in visual acuity was noted among patients with “wet” (neovascular) or “dry” (central geographic atrophy) AMD.

The study also found that improvements in acuity remained significantly improved, compared to pre-surgery acuity, in the 865 eyes available for follow-up.

The study also examined the effects of various vitamins on slowing the progression of cataracts. Results suggest that high doses of vitamins C, E and beta-carotene do not affect the development or progression of cataracts. However, the study suggests that this vitamin combination plus zinc does reduce the risk of progression to advanced AMD by 25 percent over the course of five years.

Read the AAO report on the effect of cataract surgery on AMD.

  • Share/Bookmark

Staying Motivated & Proactive in Today’s Ophthalmic World

January 1, 2010 by Ann Deters  
Filed under Features

Elective case volumes are down in this poor economy; government healthcare plan is reducing Medicare reimbursements even further; and your house hasn’t recovered in value since the 2008-09 real estate down turn. What’s a healthcare person to do?!?  

Like our forefathers, we need to adapt and modify the way in which we do business and expend monies during poor economic times. Perhaps to counter the decrease in cases, you might look to provide added value services to your patients. An example would be to provide hearing tests and hearing aids to your patients. To elaborate on hearing services, here are some little known facts; (1)  50%+ of all senior citizens have significant hearing loss, (2) 80% of them have never been tested for such loss, and (3) hearing aids are the only effective treatment for 90% of such patients.  So think about it — for every 100 patients who come through your waiting room, 50 of these patients have a hearing problem and 40 have done nothing to address it. Baby-boomers’ hearing loss is far greater than earlier generations. Plus, this group is more apt to seek treatment. Hearing services could prove to be a natural fit in ophthalmology.

Another step forward would be to engage the creative side of you & your staff by having brainstorming sessions with your key people. The objective for these meetings would be to come up with ideas for added services, ways to improve efficiencies, and areas for cost cutting.

Most importantly, remember to focus on your blessings, not your misfortunes. It’s a known fact that positive people are more successful (and with less health problems) than negative thinkers. If you have difficulty staying positive, I would encourage you to give yourself daily pep talks and keep telling yourself “I can’t change this bad situation, but I can certainly change my attitude toward it.”

  • Share/Bookmark

Vision through updates.

November 24, 2009 by Ann Deters  
Filed under Features

Cataracts occur when the eye’s natural lens becomes cloudy with age.

Cataracts don’t harm the eye but can progressively impair vision.

Cloudy lenses can be removed and replaced with artificial lenses designed to correct a range of vision problems.

With a variety of new replacement lenses on the market, it’s wise to talk to your eye doctor about your options.

Like bum knees and crow’s feet, cataracts are the price we pay for getting older. Cataracts form when the normally transparent lens of the eye turns cloudy. At least three out of five people over age 60 will eventually develop them. Today, thanks to a steady march of advances, cataract replacement surgery often gives people better vision than they’ve had in years.

Progress in the field has been nothing short of astonishing, experts say, starting with the development of artificial lenses about 30 years ago.

Patients can now choose from a wide range of artificial lenses. The most common are monofocal lenses, which focus vision at a single distance, the way a pair of standard glasses does. Before surgery, ophthalmologists test the eyes to choose the best prescription for the artificial lens, based on whether patients are nearsighted or farsighted or have normal vision.

Multifocal lenses designed to focus both up close and at a distance, are a newer option. They are particularly appealing because by the time people develop cataracts, usually starting in their 60s, most suffer from presbyopia and require reading glasses. Presbyopia occurs when the body’s natural lens stiffens with age and eye muscles can no longer focus it for close vision.

Techniques to insert the new lenses have also been refined. In the past, doctors had to make a relatively large incision in the clear capsule that contains the natural lens. Now a technique called phacoemulsification breaks up the damaged lens so it can be removed in fragments through a much smaller opening. Replacement lenses are made of a material pliable enough to be rolled up and inserted through the opening. Once inside, they unfold to fill the capsule. The entire procedure usually takes less than 30 minutes and is typically performed using an anesthetic eye drop.

Monofocal lenses, which have long been in use and are covered by insurance, remain the most common choice of replacement lens. But multifocal lenses are growing in popularity.

A variety of multifocal brands are available, but they all work in one of two basic ways. One design presents two images to the retina, one focused close and the other at a distance. The brain then chooses which one to “see.” The second design, called an accommodating lens, incorporates a kind of hinge that allows eye muscles to focus the lens either near or far.

These so-called premium lenses are not considered medically necessary, they aren’t covered by Medicare or private insurance. The additional cost can run up to $3,000 per eye.

Another new artificial lens design, called a Toric lens, corrects astigmatism, which is caused by an abnormal curvature of the cornea. Like multifocal lenses, they are considered premium lenses and aren’t covered by most insurance plans.

But there are drawbacks. Patients sometimes complain about seeing haloes around lights at night. In addition, multifocal lenses designed to present two images to the retina can decrease contrast, making it more difficult to see in dim light.

Some doctors believe the drawbacks outweigh the benefits, especially because the majority of patients end up having to wear reading glasses for very fine print.

Most eye specialists expect multifocal lens designs to improve. One approach under development is a plastic gel that would be injected into the capsule that held the original lens and would form a highly pliable new lens.

Monofocal lenses, meanwhile, are already so refined that the results for many patients are dramatic.

  • Share/Bookmark

Multifocal IOLs-Adverse Visual Effects and Their Treatment

October 13, 2009 by Jason Carpenter  
Filed under Features

Multifocal IOLs-Adverse Visual Effects and Their Treatment

Monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) have long been the standard in lens replacement after cataract removal.  However, in the last few years multifocal IOLs have established a firm presence in the marketplace.  Monofocal IOLs can only be used to give a single defined focusing point.  This allows a patient the choice to either see distance or close up. Therefore glasses must be used to correct either the presbyopia or myopia.  Multifocal IOLs, of course, allow for multiple areas of focus and allows for spectacle independence.  Although multifocal intraocular lenses appear to be an easy choice for a patient, there have been problems associated with these types of IOLs such as halos, reduced contrast sensitivity, and blurred vision.  These symptoms, though troubling to the patient and the surgeon, have been shown to be resolved the majority of the time.

OSN Super Site recently cited a study in which it was shown, that of 43 eyes included in the study approximately 81% achieved improved vision after a conservative treatment regimen, 7% improved after IOL exchange, and only 12% showed no improvement.  The treatments included excimer, drug therapy, laser iridioplasty, and YAG laser capsulotomy.  The authors of the study, as well as Dr. Jay Pepose in the review of the OSN article stated that YAG capsulotomy should be one of the last treatment choices.  This is due to the possibility the YAG not being effective and if an IOL exchange needs to be done the capsular bag is now compromised and it makes for a much more difficult procedure.  Further studies have shown that patients that have had multifocal IOL implantation may need a 6 month neuroadaption period.  This simply means that the brain needs adequate time to develop or alter neural pathways to improve visual function after the IOL has been implanted.

Although Multifocal IOLs have been shown to have certain post op adversity, one can’t deny the success they have had in freeing a patient from being tied to their glasses.  Nearly all patients either receive treatment or neuroadaptation takes place to accommodate for the multifocal IOL and the adverse visual effect are resolved.  Patient satisfaction and positive outcomes are always the wishes of the surgeons implanting these IOLs.  Proper patient education in the rewards, possible adverse effects, and the treatments of these adverse effects are essential when planning to implant a multifocal IOL.

  • Share/Bookmark

Making Cataracts More Profitable

September 1, 2009 by Ann Deters  
Filed under Features

Improving profitability in an already efficient operation has its challenges. However as the saying goes, when one stops improving, one stops growing.  The key to improving is to continually evaluating your efficiencies when it comes to patient & staff scheduling, doctors block time, labor mix and related costs, disposable costs and anesthesia expenditures.

Scheduling patients at the right time to make certain you have the right amount of patients in the queue for your staff and surgeon is crucial. Avoiding lateness (whether it’s the patient, surgeon or staff) is the key, along with making sure your surgeon and/or staff do not take breaks between cases.

Efficient staffing of your pre-op, operating room(s) and post op often times involves hiring part-time staff who can pick up the extra load whether it be prepping the patient, scrubbing or circulating in the OR, cleaning instruments, etc…  Staffing your center with more part time staff can reduce your benefit costs and staff overhead. Each function in the center should be done by someone with the proper skills and appropriate pay scale.  It has proven to be very economical to utilize outsourcing services, such as Vantage Outsourcing. They not only provide staff, but also all the equipment, micro instruments and disposables used in a cataract procedures.

Disposable costs are a major cost of doing cataract procedures. Every six months to a year, asking your surgeon/owner to evaluate his/her surgical preferences and consider alternative disposables and/or suppliers can prove to be very profitable. When surgeon asks for a more expensive supply, provide the surgeon with a cost/benefit analysis of adding this supply and the impact of profitability on each of their cases. WIth the expertise of companies such as Vantage Outsourcing, they too can help you reduce our case costs by sharing with you what other facilities and/or doctors are doing and by recommending quality disposable items to use as an alternative to your current costly disposables.

2 OR set up may be good for some, but not for all.  Many surgeons like working in an environment where they go back and forth between two ORs. Vantage Outsourcing generally recommends to their clients that unless the surgeon is doing five or more cases an hour and at least 20 cases a day, we have found that the 2 OR set up to be inefficient. Keep in mind with 2 ORs, the center needs to equip each room with a phacoemulsification equipment and microscope, as well as staff. Unless a surgeon is fast and doing significant volumes, your paid staff and anesthesia person may be waiting on the surgeon to complete cases, which becomes very inefficient and costly to a center.

The easiest way to improving profitability is to increase case volume. This may mean taking time out of your busy day to visit with the area optometric businesses to find out to which surgeon they are referring their patients. Let them know what your center and surgeon have to offer their patients. As part of the outsourcing service, Vantage Outsourcing is able to share with you the referral patterns of ODs in a particular market, in relations to the various MDs. This information is extremely valuable and helpful in determining where a facility and/or doctor needs to put forth their efforts in terms of OD relationships.

In summary, you need to know, evaluate & improve your efficiencies and identify the sources of your surgeon’s referral base, in order to improve your cataract service profitability.

  • Share/Bookmark

Eye Surgeon Facing Medicare Fraud Accusations Found Dead

August 17, 2009 by Beckers ASC Review  
Filed under Becker's ASC Review

Philip Gabriele, MD, and his wife, Marcella Gabriele, who were recently indicted following charges that they had defrauded Medicare and other insurers, were found dead inside the Gabriele Eye Institute in Elkhart, Ind., according to a report in The Goshen News.

The Gabrieles were accused of falsely diagnosing cataracts and other disorders in patients and often performing unnecessary surgeries, according to a report from WSBT 2 in South Bend, Ind. The Gabrieles also faced allegations that they fraudulently billed Medicare, Indiana Medicaid and other private insurers and altered patient charts to make it appear as though the false diagnoses had been correct.

The indictment came after a two-year investigation of the Gabrieles.

  • Share/Bookmark

Looking Ahead

While adding ophthalmology services may not produce impressively high profit margins, ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) may find that case volume, driven by cataract surgeries in particular, could boost revenue streams. Many ophthalmology-related procedures, including cataracts, can be performed quickly and can fill up an empty OR for an entire morning or afternoon. A 2008 survey from VMG Health Intellimarker stated that ophthalmology is the third highest specialty in total case volume, representing 15 percent of all case volumes in the United States. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)’s recent report on outpatient surgery confirms that there were 3.1 million cataract surgeries completed in 2006.1

“I’ve seen surgeons do four (procedures) in an hour,” says Dick Minors, director of access services and sales administration at SightPath Medical. “But I’d say on average, a surgeon can do three in an hour. So the (surgeons and staff) can turn around a room quickly and have another procedure up and running in a short amount of time.”

Minors acknowledges the small profit margins associated with cataract surgeries but compares them to orthopedic cases: “Although you make a large gross margin on an orthopedic case, you might be able to do three, four or five cataract procedures in the same time that you’re doing that one orthopedic case. I think in fairness, you’d have to say that the margins per case are not big, but they can do a lot of cases in a morning.”

Baby boomers and their eye-care needs are partially driving the spike in cataract procedures. By 2010, the older population is projected to be at 40 million, due to the fact that the baby boomer generation will turn 65 in 2011. This will result in a doubling of the older population by 2030, growing from 35 million to 72 million. And many of those seniors will be in need of cataract surgery, states Ann Deters, a member of the cataract division staff at Vantage Outsourcing.

“The older population will continue to grow at a faster pace than the total population and this trend will continue well into the 21st century.” She continues, “With this scenario present, expanding residency training programs to their maximum capacity will maintain the current national ophthalmologist-to-population ratio. But, it will not be enough to address the shift in demographics as baby boomers age. Bottom line is that we need to start putting things in place over the next 12 years in order to meet the growing demand of cataract patients.”

Another issue for adding ophthalmology is the equipment and the costs involved. Melissa Waldroup, a product manager in the ophthalmology division of Leica Microsystems, states that new, state-of-the-art equipment for ophthalmic procedures is readily available, and can have a dramatic effect on saving case times.

“In considering something like a new surgical microscope, which is a high-dollar capital budget expense, physicians and facilitators should look at how this piece of equipment will do more than give a good view. New microscopes offer features like auto reset, rotatable beam splitters, small footprint and programmable preference lists, which can together save eight minutes per case.”

One way that surgery centers can improve profit margins is through outsourcing, says Minors. “I think the other part is if I owned a surgery center, and it was a multispecialty surgery center, I would look to bring a service in. Because if you’re just going to bring in one ophthalmologist or two — ophthalmologists are like other doctors — they’ll either stay or they may not stay. Is it really smart to buy the $300,000 worth of equipment, instrumentation and capital, then six months later, the physician leaves? Even after you lose one surgeon and gain another, it doesn’t mean they’re going to like the same equipment. And there isn’t just one company’s product that’s popular out there.”

For multispecialty surgery centers who want to utilize their space without making any capital expenditures, outsourcing is the best way to go, Minors believes. “I think the combination of the aforementioned programs works quite nicely in that they’ve got an OR; they want to fill it with procedures one day a week or two days a week all morning.”

Another factor could be reimbursement from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Unlike other specialties that have taken a considerable hit in payments, ophthalmology has stayed relatively free of reductions in recent years. There is, however, a planned cut of 2 percent coming in Medicare’s payment schedule for 2010. But not to worry, states Waldroup.

“It is still a worthy specialty to get into, even with the state of Medicare and the future outlook,” says Waldroup. “Ophthalmology still seems of the highest volume of cases of any other specialty. The volume seen still makes this specialty profitable, but with the outlook of Medicare, hospitals will need to tighten their belt, and ASCs will either continue to fight for higher reimbursement rates or be absorbed into hospitals.

“Truth be told,” says Minors, “it depends on what you look at with Medicare reimbursement. There’s an ambulatory surgery center reimbursement and there’s a hospital reimbursement. And of course, there’s the provider side or the surgeon side. And the provider side has been going down. I want to say, every year it goes down a few dollars. A lot of people would say it hasn’t gone down a lot, but if you’re a surgeon, you might say if it goes down $5 to $8 per year, that’s a lot. It’s a mixed bag because ASC (reimbursement) has been going down the last few years. Actually for about two or three years, it stayed the same — $979 per procedure and then it’s come down $10 or $15. But hospitals for the last seven or eight years have actually gone up every year; four to six percent every year.” He also feels that because surgery centers don’t have all the expenses hospitals do is a big reason why Medicare chooses to pay hospitals more. He also warns that ASCs also need to and are exceptionally on top of their costs, and what they’ll accept, to avoid the sting of reimbursement reductions.

Deters also believes CMS, other than the upcoming reduction in 2010, will not significantly reduce reimbursement for cataract procedures. She points out that the ophthalmology industry did take significant hits received over the past 10 to 20 years from Medicare, and doesn’t feel that they would delve any deeper in ophthalmology. “I feel CMS is looking to other fields, such as orthopedics, for reimbursement reductions.”

Reference

1. Cullen KA, et al. Ambulatory Surgery in the United States, 2006. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Health Statistics Reports No. 11. Jan. 28, 2009.

  • Share/Bookmark

Next Page »